<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Code Camp</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.phpvs.net/2008/01/27/code-camp/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.phpvs.net/2008/01/27/code-camp/</link>
	<description>ASP.Net and PHP go head to head</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 07:03:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: theY4Kman</title>
		<link>http://www.phpvs.net/2008/01/27/code-camp/comment-page-1/#comment-111</link>
		<dc:creator>theY4Kman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 12:26:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.phpvs.net/2008/01/27/code-camp/#comment-111</guid>
		<description>Yes, I&#039;ve been working with PHP for most of my developmental career, and I&#039;ve strived to make my servers work as fast and as efficient as possible. However, I&#039;ve only just begun working with ASP.NET, and I don&#039;t know nearly as much about performance for it as PHP. I&#039;d love to know some of Richard&#039;s tweaks.

Oh, and a big difference between ASP.NET and PHP is that you can get PHP&#039;s source. No matter what you do with ASP.NET, you&#039;ll always have the same binaries.

I don&#039;t mean to be callous or condescending in this post. Just a disclaimer :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I&#039;ve been working with PHP for most of my developmental career, and I&#039;ve strived to make my servers work as fast and as efficient as possible. However, I&#039;ve only just begun working with ASP.NET, and I don&#039;t know nearly as much about performance for it as PHP. I&#039;d love to know some of Richard&#039;s tweaks.</p>
<p>Oh, and a big difference between ASP.NET and PHP is that you can get PHP&#039;s source. No matter what you do with ASP.NET, you&#039;ll always have the same binaries.</p>
<p>I don&#039;t mean to be callous or condescending in this post. Just a disclaimer <img src='http://www.phpvs.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blake</title>
		<link>http://www.phpvs.net/2008/01/27/code-camp/comment-page-1/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>blake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 19:31:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.phpvs.net/2008/01/27/code-camp/#comment-5</guid>
		<description>Performant isn&#039;t even a word!  Well, ok, &lt;a href=&quot;http://dictionary.reference.com/search?r=2&amp;q=performant&quot; target=&quot;_new&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;it is a word&lt;/a&gt;, but it means &quot;a performer&quot;.  You cromulent verbers really embiggen me.

Despite the wordsmithing, this is definitely a good point about performance.  I have always compiled PHP from source just so that I could remove a lot of the modules that I don&#039;t need.  Because every apache thread will initialize its own instance of PHP, you can save a lot of memory by compiling out the junk you don&#039;t use.  It is quite often the case that taking an environment or platform of any kind out of the box will result in good compatibility, but sub-optimal performance.

It would be interesting to see a list of what tweaks Richard did to IIS to get his performance up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Performant isn&#039;t even a word!  Well, ok, <a href="http://dictionary.reference.com/search?r=2&#038;q=performant" target="_new" rel="nofollow">it is a word</a>, but it means &#034;a performer&#034;.  You cromulent verbers really embiggen me.</p>
<p>Despite the wordsmithing, this is definitely a good point about performance.  I have always compiled PHP from source just so that I could remove a lot of the modules that I don&#039;t need.  Because every apache thread will initialize its own instance of PHP, you can save a lot of memory by compiling out the junk you don&#039;t use.  It is quite often the case that taking an environment or platform of any kind out of the box will result in good compatibility, but sub-optimal performance.</p>
<p>It would be interesting to see a list of what tweaks Richard did to IIS to get his performance up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

